Yea, I know it's not a "sport" machine. A sport machine won't work for me at all. I'm just trying to determine how much more "sporty" it is than my Viking, specifically how it handles. My Viking has a bit of a "push" (understeer) as you come into a corner, which is no big deal if it had enough punch to bring the back end around with the throttle & even things out. It doesn't.
My machine spends 70% of it's time on our place here. The bed will be full of sprinkler parts, shovels, etc.. On our place in North Idaho, we have a little more fun with it. But even there, it'll spend most of it's time in low range 4wd.
My Vike has 850 miles, and 194 hrs. Computes to an average speed of 4.3 mph.
Keep in mind, I traded one of my ATV's for the Viking. It was a Kawasaki Brute Force 750i. The sucker ripped. I put 5,000+ miles on that thing & loved it. It GPS'd at just over 70 mph, and I could bust the tires loose on a gravel road at will. I'm not saying I need that much of a power to weight ratio... but I definitely want some "rip".
And for the guy that recommended Polaris.. My wife works at a multi-line store that has Polaris. On paper I really like the General, but all it takes is a small amount of research & you realize the build quality/reliability is not as good as Honda or Yamaha.
I would not hesitate to jump in my Vike and go into the boonies. I know it'll get me back. I bought a Honda Rancher ES new in '02. I still use it regularly, & there is just short of 10K on the clock. It has never let me down.
I wouldn't have the same level of confidence in a Polaris.