If my doctor had followed the current standard of care for the procedure instead of the antique version AND more importantly had visualized the nerve location before starting AND even more importantly realized that he was out of his league and referred me to a thoracic surgeon instead, I wouldn't be in this situation.
If nothing else, when I jerked, not once but TWICE while under his knife, he could/should have verified that the nerve was not transected while he had me on the table. (I EVEN ASKED HIM DID HE TOUCH A NERVE OR SOMETHING!!!!) Even I with a very cursory examination of procedures online could find that a reaction like that is an indication that a nerve was contacted and a doctor should find and verify that the nerve hasn't been transected.
When I came back to him less than 5 min after the surgery and said I couldn't raise my arm, he could have cut the sutures and opened me back up and made sure that he didn't cut anything while I was still numb from the Lidocaine but instead he just said that he didn't do it.
Instead he said that it wasn't anything that he did and if he had cut the nerve I wouldn't be able to use my arm at all. Which is an indication that he apparently is a doctor who doesn't understand anatomy.
Then he had his nurse call me and tell me that it was just a reflex (which is caused by some type of a shock to a nerve fiber, duh....) or it was because of my metabolism of a Lidocaine...
Luckily I took it upon myself to go to an ortho who agreed something was wrong and sent me to an EMG study to find out that the SAN was not working. Hopefully, I am still in the window of getting it repaired if it was transected instead of needing a graft.
Sorry for the thread derail.