500: Let me say this again, I am a Honda fan (which is why I care enough to be apart of this forum). Owned their ATV's for years (since the late 70's), and while I currently own Polaris I am not necessarily a fan of Polaris (but I have not had any serious issues with them since I bought a RZR in 2011). I more disappointed in Honda's SXS strategy for all the reasons I have stated many times prior.
My question to you is what makes a P5 a utility machine? Half the the suspension of the others? half the CC's of the others? Shorter wheelbase, more maneuverable? This could sell some machines but hardly a feature to hang your hat on. Could a 50" RZR not be used equally as well as a utility machine? I would say it could. 500, there are tons of ranchers and farmers out here using them as such AND ride trails on the weekends. There is a saying that goes something like this "A lot can always do a little, but a little can never do a lot". Many on here say that" I don't need a trail machine that goes 60 mph 38 mph out of the P5 is fine". Well maybe, but a RZR can go slow as well. I can also keep up with traffic on the roads and highways that we are legal to run on out here (which is all but Idaho State highways, unless otherwise restricted).
I would argue that a typical SXS utility machine like the P7 or Ranger doesn't need to be 50". Typical utility machines don't operate in confined areas. So Honda feels that they are going to "conquer" the 50" utility market first? Speaking of economics, how many machines do you suppose that equates to? Damn few, check any aftermarket supplier for P5 equipment. Very little aftermarket support for the machines because they are slow selling. Some Honda guys are buying them, but they are certainly not making any marketshare inroads with this machine (and they wont).
This is why I think the P5 does compete, like it or not with the RZR. I doubt you really believe that the P5 and 50 RZR's are not cross shopped. You can bet they are. Your right the 50" market will get bigger, especially if more trails are so restricted. I guess we will just have to disagree about the direction Honda has taken in their quest to take on the SXS market. I think it was foolish to offer a machine that is as underperforming as the P5 and than call it a utility machine, like it is somehow more capable as a utility machine than better performing competitive trail machines.
As for me 500, I ride trails, I don't treat my RZR as a sport machine although the St Anthony sand dunes are just down the road. I am also an excavator by trade and use my RZR as a job site machine. The machine fills those roles very well. Most guys I know use their machines the same way Trail, Utility and for some Sport, one machine does it all, more less.
Honda could own the SXS market following the very same business model as Polaris. All they need to do is offer a Honda quality machine that at least matches the performance of the competition. Do that with a Hondamatic TYPE tranny that can go full auto or manual like the ATV's. Beat Polaris at their own game. This bulls*** of creating a new niche with the p5 is ridiculous.
The test will be this, when or if Honda offers a RZR type 50" machine, watch what happens to the P5. I believe it will go the way of the dodo bird.