PA Crude said:
Thank you Idahohntr,
Just got back from my test ride.
Drove the Viking and the Pioneer ...
No comparison, the Honda was quieter and much less vibration.
I felt a bit of holdback just momentarily after letting off the accelerator.
Unfortunately was not able to take it on any hills.
Brakes felt a little strange.
I think I was the first to test ride this unit.
I guess the brakes have to break in?
Also smelled funny.... I guess lubricants burning off the new engine?
Ever notice this?
Yes, brakes need break-in just like engine. Lots of metal coatings get burnt off as well, so strange smells are normal during the few hours. You can also expect increased fuel consumption and engine temps along with less horsepower during break in.
The last Pioneer i drove had just been assembled, and its brakes were pretty weak from not being broken in. The 1st one i drove had a few miles on it and the brakes were great. I feel confident that the Pioneer will have good braking.
I think the engine braking will be in-line with the gearing...that is, it won't hold back like a good manual shift Honda quad in 1st gear, or a CVT machine in low range. I recently drove a Rhino for the 1st time and was surprised at how high the gearing was. We can assume that the Viking probably has about the same gearing...so i think they may hold back just slightly better at lower speeds in high, but the Pioneer does have decent engine braking...far better than the "none" that Rangers have. Good enough not to be an issue.
Also be aware that the Pioneer uses input from the brake pedal to decide when to downshift, and to manipulate the idle bypass valve to deliver max engine braking, so if you weren't on the brakes, you weren't getting the most the Pioneer can deliver.
If all else fails, there has to be a dealer somewhere near a hill. Tell them you ain't gonna buy it until you take it down a steep grade. They'll do it.