Not everyone experiences the shift problems and some WAY worse than others. Personally, I believe it is a tolerance and/or assembly issue with the Sub-Trans. Some are put together from the factory at the tighter end of the tolerance and some the looser. For example...I have the CA Tech shift plate and it works perfectly other than the paint rubbing off in the channels. I have not had any of the problems others have experienced with the stock or CA plate. Is there anyone that has gone from the CA to the one featured in this thread that can offer feedback? I like the reverse to low & reverse to high set up of the CA plate (R turning radius) and it only takes a split second to come to a complete stop and smoothly shift. IMHO I think some people believe they are driving a real car and not realizing the drivetrains origin is motorcycle technology. I also find it amazing that some people complain about having to stop to shift from low to high. Every 4x4 I have ever been in requires the same. The belt boys can't even shift out of 4WD without stopping. To me, it's the same as whining about the throttle response. if you want a mushy throttle get a belt machine.
And yeah.. That shifter handle is a b****. I rung my own bell when it came off and punched myself in the face.
- You might have one assembled at the tighter end of tolerance so it works better.
- Mine might be somewhat in the middle. I have had the "Bang" occur a couple times and it is a bit finicky to engage into low so I engineered the shift gate to mitigate it and so far it is working as expected.
- Then there are a few unlucky souls that have their Sub-Trans assembled at the loose end of the tolerance range and go bad in 500 miles or less. I believe one of them lasted 250 miles.
Of course, this is all speculation but would certainly be a plausible explanation as to why the CA gate is not giving you problems.