C
Chooglin
Guest
Ok that's what I thought !yes eye to eye
I will take some measurement's tomorrow, maybe it won't work like I thought it would !
Ok that's what I thought !yes eye to eye
Thanks @solrus , I may have to wait a few weeks before I can get them. I was just window shopping ealier to see who had them cheapest !Chooglin , are you still looking for standard model ??
I found , 1 pair left Progressive Suspension Standard 425 Series Rear Shock - 225/400 Spring Rate (lbs/in) - 425-1002 ATV & UTV - Dennis Kirk, Inc.
Very crude drawing , but this should give you a good idea how I will do this !
View attachment 24982
Doing the back will actually be esier than the front was !
You are correct , but you also have to remember, you are changing the angle also. The more angle on the shock = less movement/compression of the shock !
Right. The greater the angle on the shock, the less "shock stroke" is required to achieve the same amount of travel. This brings up a good point though, you guys may find you need to add bump stops and/or limiting straps so as not to overextend the cv. By angling the shock you are increasing total wheel travel which is awesome (and gives me an idea for my 700) but by how much?? I have no idea.You are correct , but you also have to remember, you are changing the angle also. The more angle on the shock = less movement/compression of the shock !
i try like hell"No more jumping monkeys on the bed " . . Just ride , no jumps on my p500.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
I am a puddle jumper"No more jumping monkeys on the bed " . . Just ride , no jumps on my p500.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
you wont anymoreI am a puddle jumper
I don't jump mine either , I am just looking for a nice suspension for the trails. I hate the fact that I need to slow way down , when I see a dip or bump up ahead !