This how a dozen people / machines in a thread gone wild run off hundreds of potential owners, no one considers the similar circumstances each of machines were placed in. In my experience what people say happened, what really happened, and a reasonable expectation of a mechanical item's limits never seem to line up.
I don't entirely agree with the above. At first it was 2 machines - now I believe it is more than 5. I DO think that something is going on. I'd love to think that Honda designed/engineered these machines to handle more than they have so far - afterall that's why many buy Honda. This same sort of issue has not happened at all with the TRX300, the foremans, rubicon, P700, etc. It should not be a necessity to realize the limitations of a machine and always operate within those parameters. Even if you could, what if my 16 year old was behind the wheel and didn't. I shouldn't always have to be worried that I need to make sure everyone that drives my P1000 is aware of its limitations. At the same time, I'm not ready to throw mud on Honda nor do I have buyer's remorse. I bought my 1000 after this thread started knowing there may be some issues. I have gotten mine in a bind with stock tires, no lift, and was able to get free with no issues - had I been running larger tires or been in more of a bind I can see that I could have encountered the same issues. I do think Honda will get it figured out. Whether it be stronger components that can be replaced during warranty, or a redesign in 2017 with incentives to trade up. Regardless, from what I've read so far it looks like Honda should have done their homework better and done more torture testing to find the failure limits instead of letting the consumer be the guinea pig (this is what Polaris has done for years). I say all that to make a point - I'm not going to take up for Honda on this issue or promote my choice. The machine obviously has limitations that some are finding and I want to know everything I can about it, the fix, etc. If Honda loses hundreds of potential sales, it is not the users faults for posting issues they have had and I'm not going to be a Honda cheerleader just because I bought a first year model.
If the numbers fall off or remain relatively low, then we can assume QC or something similar. If this is truly a problem for a decent percentage of owners, hopefully Honda releases a service bulletin with some sort of fix that can be made during the warranty period.
I'm very pleased with my P1000, and would likely buy it again given the use I intend for it. If I was big into lifts/mud tires/mudding, the P1000 would definitely not be my top choice. That said, I don't like the reverse chain in the Polaris transmission nor the long term reliability issues with regulators, ball joints, tie rod ends, timing chain tensioner, fuel rail issues, front differential noise, prop shaft not being trued/phased correctly, etc.. Even if Honda doesn't come out with a fix, if it is a real problem you can bet the aftermarket will answer it just like they do for all the other models that have shortcomings.
Just my thoughts........
Waylan