DG Rider
Member: Triple Clutch Club
Lifetime Member
So if course, I buy a 500 that doesn't even have one......I love that big old bed.
So if course, I buy a 500 that doesn't even have one......I love that big old bed.
Whoa whoa whoa... I never said I'd trade my beloved 6.0! But if someone stole it from under my hood, I'd take a 300 as a replacement lol! I'd reject whatever Ford's pre eco-boost V6 was and GM's Vortech V6. Blehhhh!!! Nasty engines.Well...I'd trade you 300 Ford's for 6.0's all day if I had them.
How so?Whoa whoa whoa... I never said I'd trade my beloved 6.0! But if someone stole it from under my hood, I'd take a 300 as a replacement lol! I'd reject whatever Ford's pre eco-boost V6 was and GM's Vortech V6. Blehhhh!!! Nasty engines.
Most folks cussed that 6.0 diesel.GM's 6.0 motor is a runner for sure. Not all that great on fuel, but pretty strong!
For a minute there, I thought you were talking about the Ford 6.0 ... as in diesel. I had an 03 SD with the 6.0. One of the best trucks I ever had.
Yeah...Lots of problems but a sexy sound and strong for sure!Most folks cussed that 6.0 diesel.
Built ugly, sound ugly, feel ugly, run ugly, just ugly concepts. (An sbc with two cylinders lopped off and add a balance shaft to keep the motor mounts from tearing apart? C'mon man!!!) GM should've dug in the parts bin and used Buick's spectacular 3800 series V6's in place of every 4.3 application. (Imagine an S-10 or Sonoma with that delicious turbocharged 3.8L that the Grand National had!)How so?
Sounds like a Cyclone or Typhoon.Built ugly, sound ugly, feel ugly, run ugly, just ugly concepts. (An sbc with two cylinders lopped off and add a balance shaft to keep the motor mounts from tearing apart? C'mon man!!!) GM should've dug in the parts bin and used Buick's spectacular 3800 series V6's in place of every 4.3 application. (Imagine an S-10 or Sonoma with that delicious turbocharged 3.8L that the Grand National had!)
We talking about toyhaulers now?Sounds like a Cyclone or Typhoon.
Lmfao!We talking about toyhaulers now?
Yeah...We've gone on a tangent. Sorry!We talking about toyhaulers now?
Built ugly, sound ugly, feel ugly, run ugly, just ugly concepts. (An sbc with two cylinders lopped off and add a balance shaft to keep the motor mounts from tearing apart? C'mon man!!!) GM should've dug in the parts bin and used Buick's spectacular 3800 series V6's in place of every 4.3 application. (Imagine an S-10 or Sonoma with that delicious turbocharged 3.8L that the Grand National had!)
Hell that my daily drive with a 5-speed it still gets shipped mileage but keeps on goingI ran two of the vortec 4.3's over 300k, one of them had 396,500 and still ran good, 4wd still worked too but the body was falling off and it had a rear main leak. Just
I ran the 4.3's for years in S-10's. About 320k on one and 396,500 on the other. Got sh**** gas mileage in a ZR2 but ran forever.
There are a few that seem to do good over time. Most have hard time getting to 100k without major work. The 6.0 ps has shown to be one of the worst turbo diesels by far. I’ve had two known people to swap out and another on the way. That’s the number 1 engine for Cummins swap, it’s cheaper to do that then to make them slightly more dependable.GM's 6.0 motor is a runner for sure. Not all that great on fuel, but pretty strong!
For a minute there, I thought you were talking about the Ford 6.0 ... as in diesel. I had an 03 SD with the 6.0. One of the best trucks I ever had.